Keywords: FJ Chalcroft, construction, Daniel Askew, work at height, Chalcroft,
  • Print
Latest Comments

There are no comments for this content

Add a comment

See comments for this content

Related Discussion

There are no related discussions.

Start new discussion

Go to discussion forum home

Chalcroft pays £340,00 for fatal 10m fall

Prosecutions and Claims |
08.11.2007

A construction firm has been fined £260,000 after a worker fell to his death when an unsecured handrail gave way.

FJ Chalcroft (Construction) of Kings Lynn, Norfolk, last month pleaded guilty to failing to ensure the health and safety of 22-year-old Daniel Askew, who died in November 2003.

The accident happened at the Belle Eau Industrial Park, Bilsthorpe, Nottinghamshire, where Chalcroft was principal contractor building a large cold store. Askew was employed by an electrical subcontractor.

Askew had paused from his work and was leaning on a handrail on the mezzanine area of the store, talking to a colleague, when the rail gave way. He fell 10m to the ground and died a short time later in an air ambulance.

The rail was made up of a single scaffold mid rail and a steel top rail, which was to form part of the permanent edge protection. There was no toe board. An HSE investigation revealed the bolts were missing from one end of the rail, so it was effectively wedged in place.

Chalcroft had failed to introduce suitable health and safety arrangements at the site. A contractor had been altering handrails as part of its system of work but there were no procedures for checks or weekly inspections.

"The construction phase health and safety plan was woefully inadequate," explained HSE inspector Cliff Seymour. "It was one of those generic documents that sat on a shelf rather than something that actually affected the management of contractors on the site.

"There were various unsafe acts identified during the course of the investigation, any one of which could have led to a fatality."

As well as missing edge protection, safeguards for roofers were inadequate and there were workplace transport failings.

Chalcroft pleaded guilty to breaching Sections 2(1) and 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act but the case was subject to a Newton hearing to establish the facts because the firm denied causing Askew's death.

Imposing a £260,000 fine with costs of £80,000, the judge at Nottingham Crown Court said that had Chalcroft applied its statutory duties, the risk would have been "materially reduced". Recorder Burns said there had been serious omissions and a "shocking breach" of the requirement to provide edge protection.

Since the accident, Chalcroft has made "strenuous efforts" to overhaul its health and safety arrangements and this fact was acknowledged by the judge.

  Your Comments No Comments
Related Comments & Analysis

Head protection

Published:08.11.2007

CDM 2007: the story so far

Published:09.11.2007

Site specifics: confined spaces

Published:01.07.2006

Combining people and vehicles safely in construction sites

Published:01.01.2007

Behavioural safety initiatives

Published:01.12.2006

See all comment & analysis

Latest Discussion

The latest discussion & debate from the healthandsafetyprofessional.co.uk discussion forums...

The HSE and road safety

On page 3 of the December issue of the IIRSM newsletter was an article headed "HSE Could be more involved". ...

John Hill | Nov 20 2008 10:14AM

HSE - Work Related Road Deaths

Does the HSE have the correct view on Work Related Road Death ... quote : 'work related road traffic accidents ...

John Fitton | Oct 09 2008 10:46AM

Looking for a cancer community!!!

Hello everybody, I am a college student and I am here for some help from you guys. I live with ...

Herry smith | Oct 07 2008 07:08AM

Start new discussion

Go to discussion forum home