Keywords: Cadbury's, confectionary, salmonella, recall, chocolate, Food Standards Agency,
  • Print
Latest Comments

There are no comments for this content

Add a comment

See comments for this content

Related Discussion

There are no related discussions.

Start new discussion

Go to discussion forum home

Cadbury left to chew on £1m salmonella fine

Prosecutions and Claims |
15.09.2007

Cadbury, the world's largest confectionery maker, has been handed a £1 million fine for hygiene offences that led to an outbreak of salmonella.

The firm was forced to recall more than a million chocolate bars in June last year after the Food Standards Agency linked the outbreak of a rare strain of salmonella with contaminated Cadbury chocolate. At least 42 people fell ill, three of whom needed hospital treatment.

The outbreak was traced back to a leaking water pipe at Cadbury's factory in Marlbrook, Herefordshire. The firm had failed to notify authorities about the contamination at the factory.

Cadbury pleaded guilty to a total of nine charges: three brought by Birmingham City Council (which enforces safety at the company's Bournville plant) under the General Food Regulations 2004 and the Food Hygiene Regulations 2006; and six by Herefordshire Council, which prosecuted the company separately for breaches at the Marlbrook factory.

On 16 July at Birmingham Crown Court, recorder James Guthrie QC fined Cadbury £500,000 for putting unsafe chocolate on sale; £100,000 for failing to inform the authorities there was salmonella in the chocolate; and £100,000 for hygiene control failures. He also fined the firm £50,000 for each of the six offences at the Marlbrook factory, and ordered it to pay a total of £152,000 in costs.

The judge said the outbreak, which came after Cadbury changed its quality-testing systems, was the result of "a serious case of negligence". In 2003, the company replaced its zero-tolerance policy on salmonella with an "allowable tolerance" level for the bacteria.

A Cadbury spokesperson offered "sincere regrets and apologies" for the outbreak and said the company had spent £20 million changing procedures to prevent a recurrence.

  Your Comments No Comments
Related Comments & Analysis

Tesco.com's driver safety initiative

Published:15.10.2007

Health and safety pay survey 2006

Published:01.10.2006

Back to Basics: Training and competence

Published:01.11.2005

Safety footwear

Published:01.05.2007

Improving your safety record

Published:01.05.2006

See all comment & analysis

Latest Discussion

The latest discussion & debate from the healthandsafetyprofessional.co.uk discussion forums...

The HSE and road safety

On page 3 of the December issue of the IIRSM newsletter was an article headed "HSE Could be more involved". ...

John Hill | Nov 20 2008 10:14AM

HSE - Work Related Road Deaths

Does the HSE have the correct view on Work Related Road Death ... quote : 'work related road traffic accidents ...

John Fitton | Oct 09 2008 10:46AM

Looking for a cancer community!!!

Hello everybody, I am a college student and I am here for some help from you guys. I live with ...

Herry smith | Oct 07 2008 07:08AM

Start new discussion

Go to discussion forum home