Keywords: London Central, bus company, bus firm fined, Omar Maouche, vehicle pit, safe system, HSE,
  • Print
Latest Comments

As a health and safety professional specialising in the motor vehicle repair industry, I see acciden ...

Daniel Parkinson
20:31 04.06.2008

Add a comment

See comments for this content

Related Discussion

There are no related discussions.

Start new discussion

Go to discussion forum home

Bus operator ignored "blindingly obvious risks"

Prosecutions and Claims |
02.06.2008

London Central Bus Company has been fined £60,000 following a incident in which a worker fell into a pit and suffered spinal injuries.

The accident happened only 15 months after an employee at the garage died in similar circumstances.

In October 2005, Omar Maouche, a bus chassis cleaner at New Cross Bus Garage in London, fell into a vehicle inspection pit as he tried to use a pit cover as a bridge to cross from one side to the other. He suffered compression of the spine.

An investigation found London Central had failed to implement a safe system of work and failed to provide proper information, training and supervision to employees.

The HSE had raised concerns about the company's risk assessments - and in particular the covering of vehicle pits - during its investigation into a fatal incident at the same garage in July 2004, when an employee died after falling into a pit.

London Central Bus Company pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act. On 30 May at the Old Bailey, the firm was fined £60,000 with £15,347 costs.

"On paper, London Central Bus Company had a reasonable system for controlling risks to their employees," said HSE inspector Loraine Charles, "but they failed to properly implement it. They failed to focus on areas of danger and missed what the judge, in this case, described as 'blindingly obvious risks'.

"The company were aware, following the previous fatal incident, that risks arising from work around vehicle pits were significant and potentially fatal but failed to ensure that they had identified and addressed all tasks where such risks arose."

  Your Comments 1 - 1 of 1 Comment

Added: 20:31 04.06.2008

As a health and safety professional specialising in the motor vehicle repair industry, I see accident reports of workers falling in to inspection pits on a regular basis, and believe that whilst the managment is constantly pushing technicians to be more productive and cutting back the task times coupled with ignoring health and safety advice, hitting them in the pocket with fines based on a percentage of the companies profits, is the only way that some businesses will learn to take Health and Safety seriously. "or not"

Daniel Parkinson

Report this comment as unsuitable

1 - 1 of 1 Comment
Related Comments & Analysis

Road risk: the web's best guides

Published:15.10.2007

Flooring specifications and slip hazards

Published:01.04.2007

New fire safety regime

Published:01.02.2006

Workplace transport: machine guards

Published:01.11.2006

Workplace Health Connect

Published:01.11.2006

See all comment & analysis

Latest Discussion

The latest discussion & debate from the healthandsafetyprofessional.co.uk discussion forums...

Serious Threat

I am finding that many of my colleagues simply do not take the risk of an office fire seriously enough.

Cheesey Cakey | Sep 04 2008 03:23PM

fire

why do we record fire outbreak on our airlines?

ihejirika uche | Sep 01 2008 11:54PM

New HSE solvent storage guidelines

Are there any members who have discovered the BS EN 14470-1 advice for storing more than 50 litres in a ...

Tony Thorpe | Sep 01 2008 02:02PM

Start new discussion

Go to discussion forum home