Keywords: health and safety, Maurice Agis, Chester-le-Street, Riverside Park, inflatable,
  • Print
Latest Comments

Why is the artist facing prosecution at all? Surely liability lies with the engineers who rigged it ...

Dean Johnson
16:26 21.02.2008

See comments for this news

Related Discussion

There are no related discussions.

Start new discussion

Go to discussion forum home

Manslaughter charge for artist

News | HSP
14.02.2008

The creator of an inflatable sculpture that killed two people after breaking free of its moorings was charged with manslaughter yesterday.

The incident happened at the Riverside Park, County Durham, in July 2006. The sculpture suddenly broke free of its moorings, rearing 70 feet into the air. Elizabeth Collings, 68, and Claire Furmedge, 38 were killed. Another 13 people were injured, including a three-year-old girl.

The inflatable art work, so large it contained several different rooms featuring different colours and sounds, rose over 150ft in the air after a gust caught underneath it.

Maurice Agis, 76, faces a count of gross negligence manslaughter after his Dreamspace sculpture overturned in County Durham.

A police statement issued yesterday said: "Durham Constabulary has today charged Maurice Agis, aged 76, with gross negligence manslaughter following advice from the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).

"Mr Agis, who was charged at Charing Cross police station in London, also faces an offence under Section 3(2) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 [HSWA]."

The company behind the project, Brouhaha International, and Chester-le-Street district council were also charged under the HSWA, as was the council's director of development services, Tony Galloway.

They were all bailed to appear before Peterlee magistrates on 26 February.

Keep up to date with the news: receive our free weekly e-newsletter.

Have your say on the latest news and prosecutions in our discussion forums.

  Your Comments 1 - 1 of 1 Comment

Added: 16:26 21.02.2008

Why is the artist facing prosecution at all? Surely liability lies with the engineers who rigged it and the park authorities who failed to carry out a proper risk assessment?

Dean Johnson

Report this comment as unsuitable

1 - 1 of 1 Comment
Latest Discussion

The latest discussion & debate from the healthandsafetyprofessional.co.uk discussion forums...

The HSE and road safety

On page 3 of the December issue of the IIRSM newsletter was an article headed "HSE Could be more involved". ...

John Hill | Nov 20 2008 10:14AM

HSE - Work Related Road Deaths

Does the HSE have the correct view on Work Related Road Death ... quote : 'work related road traffic accidents ...

John Fitton | Oct 09 2008 10:46AM

Looking for a cancer community!!!

Hello everybody, I am a college student and I am here for some help from you guys. I live with ...

Herry smith | Oct 07 2008 07:08AM

Start new discussion

Go to discussion forum home